Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 50:15

אמר קרא (שמות כב, ד) ובער בשדה אחר ולא ברה"ר

But should we not let Tooth and Foot involve liability for damage done [even] on public ground because of the following <i>a fortiori</i>: If in the case of Horn<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' While in the state of Tam; cf. supra p. 73. ');">³⁷</span> where [even] for damage done on the plaintiff's premises only half payment is involved, there is yet liability to pay for damage done on public ground, does it not necessarily follow that in the case of Tooth and Foot where for damage done on the plaintiff's premises the payment is in full, there should be liability for damage done on public ground? — Scripture, however, says, And it shall feed in another man's field,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXII, 4. ');">³⁸</span> excluding thus [damage done on] public ground.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 50:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.